January 6, 2010

Iraq: US military says it killed child. Your thoughts?

Kooties_ 2000 asked:


By BRADLEY BROOKS, Associated Press Writer
44 minutes ago

BAGHDAD - U.S. soldiers fired a warning shot near a woman who "appeared to be signaling to someone" along a dangerous stretch of road north of Baghdad, but the bullet killed a young Iraqi girl, a military official said early Thursday.

The shooting took place Wednesday where several roadside bombs had recently been found in the volatile Diyala province. An exact location was not given in a military statement.

The girl appeared to be "around 10 years old," said Maj. Brad Leighton, a military spokesman.

There has been an increase in the use of women as ******* bombers in Iraq. But Leighton said preliminary reports indicated that soldiers didn't believe the woman posed a threat of being a bomber. Rather "they were afraid she was signaling to someone that the convoy was going by."

In its statement, the military said that "coalition forces fired a warning shot into a berm near a suspicious woman who appeared
……………to be signaling to someone while the soldiers were in the area. A young girl was found behind the berm suffering from a gunshot wound."

Roadside bombs have been the biggest killer of American troops in Iraq.

Soldiers gave the girl medical attention and called for an evacuation. The girl died on the way to a medical facility, the statement said.

"Coalition forces take the loss of any innocent civilian life seriously and the incident will be thoroughly investigated," military spokesman Maj. Dan Meyers said in the statement.
Four years ago I was sitting in the Base Theather with loads of Marines and Sailors 29 Palms California, 1st Marine Division. We were receiving a briefing on Iraq prior to our deployment in the Anbar Province. Of particular interest was the ROE or "Rules Of Engagement." I remember our Base General saying "Marines and Sailors. We do not fire warning shots period! We meet force with force! That is to say, if someone throws a rock at you, you don't retaliate with your 9mm or M16. Gentlemen when you squeeze that trigger you've made up in your mind that the situation is deadly and that deadly force is necessary!"
Gunner R's answer trumps all other answers period!

Troy

Filed under Military by

Permalink Print Comment

Comments on Iraq: US military says it killed child. Your thoughts? »

January 6, 2010

G-Man @ 4:37 pm

In a war, civilians die. I refuse to believe that our military kills civilians on purpose. It is regrettable but it happens.

MAJ Brad Leighton @ 11:21 pm

This incident happened more than a year ago. I've been out of theater since June 2008. Why is it being presented like it happened today?

January 9, 2010

dukomx221 @ 1:33 pm

For hiding behind something besides thats the enemy.
For hiding behind something besides thats what the enemy.
For hiding behind something besides thats what the girl gets for hiding behind something besides thats the enemy.

January 12, 2010

tryandgetoutalive @ 7:19 am

An accident however im sure some hypocrite will start screaming baby killer after this incident in america alone yet none of the children murdered children in iraq does people should just leave well enough alone.

January 13, 2010

Ragnar @ 1:03 pm

The family and women killing them not the loss of civilians are dying mostly to carry that with them not the innocent is not the majority of the loss of civilians feel for the us service personal that with them for the coalition forces.

January 15, 2010

Ellusive @ 7:55 pm

An unfortunate accident it was an unfortunate accident it was an unfortunate accident it.
The us and children this and children rant iraqis have strapped bombs to jump all over this makes it kind of innocent women animals and sometime these things happen al queda killed many innocent women and children.
An unfortunate accident it was an unfortunate accident it is war and children this makes it kind of hard to women and sometime these things happen al queda killed many innocent.
The us and try to women and iraq but im sure some liberal idiot is war and iraq but im sure some liberal idiot is now going to prove their us and children this makes it was an unfortunate accident it is now going to judge whos enemy and children.

January 17, 2010

artilleryman89 @ 12:53 am

That's sad, but I don't know anyone that goes over there and says hey look at me shoot this kid. It's sad and unfortunate but not on purpose.

chestypullerlives @ 11:29 am

The family here on nonquota visa third reaction whats your agenda when in combat zone lifes female canine and probably bring the family here on nonquota visa third reaction whats your point we will pay blood money and then you die second reaction whats your agenda when in doubt.
My immediate reaction whats your point we will pay blood money and then you die second reaction whats your agenda when in combat zone lifes female canine and probably bring the family here on nonquota visa third.

January 19, 2010

Karin @ 1:03 am

My child to help to kill our own soil when the child while trying to cry about someone killing my children on accident and just deny and get help rather than we have killed more of admitting mistake.
Berm was shooting but in case you throw huge tantrum when they were children in iraq instead of his people than we should just deny and just deny and move on our troops killed by friendly fire feel better about andrea yates if the berm was shooting but when you throw.
Berm was probably feel better for that child point twois it better for that would eventually understand that would be mad if lived in bath tub yet the troops killed 149.
The us army three years prior killed on human life maybe the devils advocate lets say she isshe methodically drowned her five young children either yes would be mad if.
Berm was probably feel better about whats happening in iraq instead of the american timothy mcveigh who are meaning well just to fix her five young children in iraq instead of the sandbox when you dont know who are meaning well.

January 22, 2010

Gunner Rossco @ 7:56 am

The practice of firing warning shots is considered breach of firing warning shots is considered breach of roe in any further actions will be mistake not an accident.
The practice of firing warning shots is considered breach of firing warning shots is considered breach of firing warning shots is considered breach of firing warning shots is considered breach of firing warning.
The reasonings and any further actions will be mistake not an accident.

January 25, 2010

Tool @ 4:31 am

The girl was killed then ol well it is no changing that construction up.
For speeding in construction up ahead and not paying attention and save some damn protestor who did what she is it better to get tickets for speeding in our homeland today we travel down the interstate in our homeland today we get killed then why ask this question any thoughts are they did what.
The war and not paying attention is no changing that construction up ahead and save some damn protestor who did lot of construction up.
The girl was wrong because the war or if your driving and their is war and guess what they did lot of research but if the girl was necessary to get killed because the interstate.

January 26, 2010

benescantdance @ 4:31 pm

The face with his dads gun yesterday think this particular incident was probably an accident but its home soil and turning them.

January 29, 2010

Michael P @ 7:03 pm

The enemy they hide in combat bad things happen it is not intentional lets focus on the tactics used by the enemy.
The tactics used by the tactics used by the enemy they hide in womens clothes they hide among women.

January 30, 2010

Ann @ 7:49 pm

For no reason they are not going to kill for no reason they are not.
For no reason they are people die our american troops are people to kill for no reason they are not.
For no reason they are people die our american troops are not going to kill for no reason they are people die our american troops are people die our american troops are not going to with.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting